I joke. Actually, it would be tough. We want to act like new music is a revolutionary thing, when in reality, it’s very evolutionary. It all traces back to Blues (and other) musicians from prior decades, back to guys like Leadbelly and folk artists.

The Beatles and Stones in part benefited from a convergence of technology and race. Here you had a time when the lines between white and black music were merged, creating something very new and exciting, and there were viable mediums to store (record) and market it.

It’s hard to imagine someone taking what we have now and making it original on the level of the Beatles…given the shear number of people with recording studios (in their basement or at their computer) and how the evolution has given us such crazy hybrids….think of musicians like Beck, what is that? Bluegrass-calypso-country-hip-hop-rock? I don’t know.

PS….the only ‘revolutionary’ music I’d point out is Jazz (IMO), but even that has origins in classical music arrangements, not counting the improvisational stuff.
References :